So, DazzaS asked "why are you on the side of big companies over the average worker?" to which I responded as below.
The sensible suggestion was made to bring the discussion in here rather than leaving it to derail the BG thread, so here it is... let the discussions begin in their rightful place!
1. Because all of these "average workers" screaming for double digit payrises have no demonstrable increase in productivity with which to justify them, which is going to increase the cost of the goods or services their employers sell, resulting in increased costs to me (and also, ironically, to all those demanding big payrises) for no additional benefit.
2. Because any of those employers in direct competition with overseas companies are going to be made less competitive, meaning a higher probability of job losses, meaning more of my taxes going on unemployment benefits.
3. Because in the case of NHS workers, they represent over 5% of the total working population, so giving them the double digit payrises they're asking for would have a massive impact on all of us, and I'm thoroughly hacked off with the way they all bang on about how they all saved the country during Covid, when for every massively overworked intensive care nurse there were multiple others sat around twiddling their thumbs because non urgent care was cancelled, and the money would surely be better spent getting that care back on track.
4. Because like many "average workers", I'd really like to retire one day, and when the strikers bang on about the rail companies, oil companies and others making big profits, I view that as news to be celebrated! Those big corporations aren't owned by Monty Burns characters rubbing their hands in glee whilst they release the hounds on the workers, they're owned mostly by those self same pension funds whose success will allow us better standards of living in retirement.
I could probably come up with more if you like?