+- +-

+-Newcomers Start Here

+-Harlequins/Rugby Links


+-Articles


Author Topic: Is the Premiership in danger of becoming a case of the Haves & Have-Nots?  (Read 566 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Fearless Fred

  • Lions Captain
  • ******
  • Posts: 3776
From the Telegraph

Gallagher Premiership warned it is in danger of becoming a 'two-tier' league
Exclusive: Sources claim a major split is emerging, with clubs that have the money to offer their top players long-term deals avoiding cuts

By
Gavin Mairs,
 CHIEF RUGBY UNION CORRESPONDENT
15 June 2020 • 4:16pm
The Premiership has been warned it is in danger of becoming a “two-tier” league after a majority of clubs were accused of rushing to re-sign their top players on long-term deals to “exploit a loophole” to avoid the £1.4 million reduction in the salary cap from July next year.

Several sources have claimed that that up to seven clubs have moved quickly to offer new long-term deals – some as long as four years (two years plus the option to stay for another two years) – to their key players ahead of Thursday’s deadline, when the new salary cap regulations come into force.

The claims come as the clubs and the Rugby Players’ Association remain locked in a stand-off over moves by some clubs to make permanent the temporary 25 per cent pay cut accepted by the players in response to the financial impact of the coronavirus lockdown.

Sources claim that a major split in the league is emerging, with Bristol, Bath, Exeter, Saracens, Northampton, Sale and Harlequins said to have the financial strength to offer new deals to their top players that will effectively see them avoid having to make cuts as only 75 per cent of their salaries will count to the cap from 2021.

Any deals that are in place before the deadline on Thursday ensures they will be honoured in full, with only 75 per cent of their salaries counting towards a reduced salary cap of £5m (plus credits of up to £1m) from the 2021/22 season, which the clubs agreed last week. The agreement will see the cap return to its current level of £6.4m (plus credits of up to £600,000) by 2024.

The number of marquee players, whose salary is not counted towards the salary cap, will also be reduced from two to one for the 2022-23 season.

“Clubs are rushing to do their deals with their key guys now so they will be in exactly the same position as they are now,” said one Premiership source.

“If you are smart you do a two-plus-two deal and with the two marquee players, you just extend and put options on them as well, so effectively the clubs that can afford it are going to end up at the current level of £6.4 million plus marquees anyway.


“They only agreed to cut the cap with a lead-in time built in so they could sort out new deals.  It is going to become a two-tier league, which completely defeats the purpose of the reduction in the salary cap this year.

“The idea behind the reduction was that everyone would be at the same level and we were going to have a really competitive Premiership next year. Instead the gap is growing, with the likes of Worcester, London Irish, Gloucester, Wasps and Newcastle left behind.”

Another source said: “The clubs have just lurched from one loophole to another. This just hasn't been thought through.”

Agents say the amount of deals being offered is unprecedented and could lead to a difference in spending between clubs of over £1.4m.

“The reality is that this will end up with a league split between those clubs who are doing the deals at the moment and those who aren’t,” said one agent.

“It is not like you are talking about a £400,000 or £500,000 difference in spending that you might get away with if you have good coaching and a good culture.

“We are talking at least a £1.4m difference plus marquees and that is a gap that is so significant that the league will be split between a top seven and the rest.”


One source defended the actions of the clubs, however, insisting it was unfair that those who have been run as successful businesses should be penalised, particularly given that the clubs received a £13m windfall last year following the investment by private equity firm CVC for a minority share in the Premiership. 

“There is a strong feeling from some of the clubs who are re-signing players that everyone has just benefited from receiving £13m for the CVC deal last year and they are in the strongest position they have been in,” said the source.

“What have those who are struggling done with the £13m? If you have mis-managed your club, why should the league be pulled down to the lowest common denominator?

“The likes of Northampton and Exeter are well-run clubs who are in pretty good shape, they are financially stable and cash rich so are probably in the best position they have been in 15 years.”

honkytonk

  • Lions Captain
  • ******
  • Posts: 3530
From a selfish point of view, its good to see us mentioned as a club with financial strength, bodes well in the bad times. 

stoquin

  • A Team Bench
  • *
  • Posts: 394
I thought they agreed the deal on salary cap reductions quickly, more to it than the simple figure reductions initially quoted. Looks like many clubs will be able to sign up there players and effectively not have a serious reduction at all.

Or am I missing something fundamental

MadMax

  • Lions Captain
  • ******
  • Posts: 1607
From a selfish point of view, its good to see us mentioned as a club with financial strength, bodes well in the bad times.

In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king!
Dumb Dumb x 1 View List

Brown Bottle

  • Lions Captain
  • ******
  • Posts: 3244
Haves & Have-Nots?

What about the Not-Nots?
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Mayor West

  • Lions Captain
  • ******
  • Posts: 1622
Only Nots from next season BB.  Doesn’t have the same ring to it now.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Banstead Quin

  • Lions Captain
  • ******
  • Posts: 1414
Well surely they all knew why the 'run in' for the cap was requested so why agree to It if you don't want want someone to find and exploit loopholes?

That's the problem with the structure at the top of PRL they only have to get a majority of have or have nots to push their way forward Bonkers really.

Anyway, at least it will dissipate over 4 years and new signings will be done correctly. Are we really going to offer Brown, Care, Marler and the others in their 30s a 4 year deal? Not really but it'll keep Marchant, Smith, Dombrandt and the other youngsters at the club for another 4 years which is a good thing. You'll still have the same problem in 4 years time when they are in their prime and effectively on the same money, so no real benefit in the long run. The have nots will be more settled and stronger and able to pay new signings a bit more.

Still, they'll all be playing global franchise rugby by then, so no problem. 😀

 

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Site Statistics

Members
Total Members: 1162
Latest: Marsi1e
New This Month: 2
New This Week: 1
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 119453
Total Topics: 6383
Most Online Today: 365
Most Online Ever: 4089
(Sunday 10-Oct-2021, 12:56*)
Users Online
Members: 36
Guests: 292
Total: 328