News:

Author Topic: Sinks was awful  (Read 2605 times)

0 Members and 96 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #15 on: »
Hang on, I'm pretty sure it was you who wet the bed and ran off?

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #16 on: »
Yeah I can't possibly see how you thought that was a useful post that wasn't going to backfire massively

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #17 on: »
He was poor for a 400,000 prop....get rid and get x2 SA scrum machines. Decent scrum and we win that game by 20pts

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #18 on: »
If someone wants to pay 500K, good luck to them

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #19 on: »
He's certainly not worth the money he's reportedly after on that showing. Mullered in the scrum and throwing stupid off loads 😠

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #20 on: »
Seems odd to rate Sink on this game alone. He certainly had a bad game, but I think he's got a bit of credit in the bank.

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #21 on: »
As I have said on the other message Tigers got into Sinks head and really did a job on him. Collier’s card was a team card I think. We were just missing a real pantomime villain and it would have been complete. I doubt Sinks will play again until to the Sarries match he needs to sort himself out.

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #22 on: »
Absolutely ridiculous keyboard warrior comments here against Sinckler. In case you didn’t notice, there were 7 other Quins players in that scrum with him.

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #23 on: »
Sinckler's always useless against Genge.

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #24 on: »
Absolutely ridiculous keyboard warrior comments here against Sinckler. In case you didn’t notice, there were 7 other Quins players in that scrum with him.

Spoken like someone who knows jack about front row work ... Sinks prances around as if he is more important than anyone else . Horrendous liability yesterday  and cost us at least 10 pts

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #25 on: »
Spoken like someone who knows jack about front row work ... Sinks prances around as if he is more important than anyone else . Horrendous liability yesterday  and cost us at least 10 pts

What does your perception of Sinckler’s self worth have to do with his ability to scrum? Absolutely nothing. And you’re supposed to be a scrum expert I assume?

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #26 on: »
Hi - just popping back to say the reason I left this forum was mouth breathing pathetic little onanists like you. Enjoy. When you’ve stopped wetting the bed pop back and play with the big boys.

There are some idiotic posts on here but few reach the low level you consistently managed so can't say I missed you.
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #27 on: »
Time to start calling 'sinks' ... 'sick note'

That makes no sense.

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #28 on: »
Spoken like someone who knows jack about front row work ... Sinks prances around as if he is more important than anyone else . Horrendous liability yesterday  and cost us at least 10 pts

Quote from: Bampotbill
Nothing more to say

I knew you didn't mean it. Sadly.

Re: Sinks was awful
« Reply #29 on: »
I’m really confused about what happened in the scrum on Saturday.

So much of England’s defeat in the final was attributed to Sinks coming off early and Dan Cole not being up to the job. It could be argued that the Springbok pack would’ve demolished most opposing packs but I can’t see how there was such inequality between the four best props in the England squad. They all know each other very well and they must’ve learned each other’s tricks etc.

I saw Sinks going long a couple of times but I also saw saw all kinds of shenanigans at the engagement. It rarely looked stable enough to receive the ball. A number was achieved on our scrum, but I don’t think Genge ‘schooled’ Sinks. I don’t think Genge alone is that talented. I think Carley got hoodwinked and I don’t know how we get around that if the current England first choice 1 and 3 don’t know how to get around it. I’d love to hear what Hagrid thought of it.