News:

Author Topic: We should burn that away kit  (Read 2215 times)

0 Members and 56 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #30 on: »

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #31 on: »
I like all of those.

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #32 on: »
Being a kit collector and a massive geek when it comes to rugby kits/boots etc, I speak with a few other collectors etc mainly over the rugby/football spectrum. One of my good pals had this to say about Castore:
If I’m honest getting castore isn’t great. “They’re having a nightmare with Newcastle at the moment. They’ve taken over operation of the club store, and yeah it’s not going well at all.”
For me, Castores designs for most of their football and rugby teams look good. But this doesn’t sound good, and almost identical to the issues with Adidas/Lovell we are currently facing this year at least. These being not having a good selection of kit for all sexes and sizes, poor stock levels, and Lovell pretty much running our merchandise department. Lovell used to be a phenomenal company to deal with but ever since partnering with Sports Direct a few years ago have completely changed their business and not for the better.

The optimum choice for me would be Nike, or stick with Adidas if they can commit to putting more effort in our kit designs like the first few years of the kit partnership with Quins, and a levelled up offering for all sexes and sizes. And never again pick a shirt for us which looks like it’s risen from a swamp. Nike for me used to ace the England kits, and have always put out great France, Toulouse, Argentina, Jaguars, Saracens, South Africa, Newcastle and more recently Toulon and Clermont kits in terms of design. I feel like they would be able to release a great varied offering too. Nike rarely ever put out a shoddy kit.

Preferably Nike or keep Adidas for me, if not then Castore, Umbro, Macron or Cotton Traders. Definitely not “Can’t-erburuy” (as I like to call them), or Samurai.

I used to love the Quins Mizuno/Kooga/O’Neills offering too from the past.
« Last Edit: Wednesday 13-Apr-2022, 20:12* by Everyone’s a Quinner »

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #33 on: »
So do I Jammy. At least they’ve stayed with the core colours.

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #34 on: »
First two are great.

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #35 on: »
The concept ones above aren’t bad except the third one which looks like a kid with a crayon has been let loose on it.

Pound for pound so to speak, Kooga in my view we’re the best.

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #36 on: »
Checkout these concept designs (cue outrage)
https://www.behance.net/gallery/138833343/Rugby-Kit-Concept-Mockup-HARLEQUINS


Yes I'd take the first one for preference, why can't we have that as the away shirt?
There was a time some bloody acronym was trying to tell the clubs every away shirt had to be predominantly white, so I'd take the second one at a pinch.
The third one is not as "authentic" in my opinion, and I wouldn't like to see it. However, if you're saying otherwise we have to play in the current farmyard brown shirts, I'd take it!

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #37 on: »
Checkout these concept designs (cue outrage)
https://www.behance.net/gallery/138833343/Rugby-Kit-Concept-Mockup-HARLEQUINS

The white-dominated one is very good - simple and has the colours; the others are too "design-orientated" and couldn't be transferred to cotton, although I can imagine plenty of people liking the first one.

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #38 on: »
Checkout these concept designs (cue outrage)
https://www.behance.net/gallery/138833343/Rugby-Kit-Concept-Mockup-HARLEQUINS


First one is great. Would love that as an away shirt - maybe add two white quarters if needed. Don't really like the away one. Change one is fun too

Another gripe with many of the adidas shirts is that they have a plain back, which just seems a bit lazy

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #39 on: »
Feels like we've had something quite similar to the away one before.

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #40 on: »
Last one I purchased was the 150th year shirt. Nothing since then has really done it for me. That horrible khaki effort though...since when was khaki in the Quins colour palette?

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #41 on: »
Talking about colour palettes.
Aren't we supposed to have dark blue in the colours as well?
I thought that we traditionally played in blue shorts.

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #42 on: »
Talking about colour palettes.
Aren't we supposed to have dark blue in the colours as well?
I thought that we traditionally played in blue shorts.

White shorts when I joined in the early 90s. Then black. Don't remember blue but if it was very dark blue ...

Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #43 on: »
I knew I had seen it somewhere -

"The Harlequins colours are French grey, magenta, chocolate, and light blue. These are reversed on the back of the jerseys.
The original colour of their shorts (or “knickerbockers”) was dark blue. The minutes from a meeting in 1906 show that they were now playing in white knickerbockers."



Re: We should burn that away kit
« Reply #44 on: »
I like some of these items:
https://harlequin-club-incorporated.square.site/?location=11eabcf3cdb1b4a09f5154ab3a322722

Purchases need to be collected on Wednesday evenings after 6:30 - but, I can't typically get down there.
Is there anyone round who could pick a hoodie and few shirts up for me?