News:

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Team For Gloucester
« Last post by never sleep on Yesterday at 11:20 am »
I didnt say all the staff, but its clear a freshen up is needed. NEV/Jones etc probably could do with a new challenge

Your post suggests that you are saying that we should bin off most of the current players.
I.e. - You say that the players have checked out and a massive clear out is needed.
You don't mention the coaches.
52
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Brian Moore
« Last post by Rugbycat on Yesterday at 11:17 am »
There is already a home grown player credit but increasing that would be a good idea, rather than just a blanket increase.

THE LEVEL OF THE SALARY CAP

For the 2025-26 Salary Cap Year, the level of the Salary Cap is £6,400,000 with the following credits and exclusions, which means that Clubs can spend at least £7.8m plus an Excluded Player Salary:

Home Grown Player Credits totalling £600,000 (up to £50,000 per player) – designed to incentivise Clubs to retain home grown talent;
EPS/International Player Credits totalling £400,000 (up to £80,000 per player) – to cover player absence during international periods;
Injured Player Credits totalling £400,000 – to allow replacement players to cover for long term injuries;
One Excluded Player – whose entire salary is excluded from the Salary Cap;
Unlimited education fund for players.
HOW DOES THE SALARY CAP WORK?

In professional sports, a Salary Cap is an agreement or rule that places a limit on the amount of money that a team can spend on player salaries – in PREM Rugby it is a total squad spend and not a restriction upon individual Salaries.
53
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Brian Moore
« Last post by MaidstoneQuin on Yesterday at 11:09 am »
Not sure what major changes to make, but I would like to see clubs benefiting more from promoting from within. Perhaps some kind of increase on the cap per registered squad players at the start of the season who've come through the academy system at the same club. Would encourage to develop the youth, rather than just blanket signing anyone, and then allow clubs to really get an extra one or two class players they might not be able to get if already spending up to the cap

54
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Team For Gloucester
« Last post by MaidstoneQuin on Yesterday at 10:54 am »
When most of the staff in any business have checked out and are not motivated, the solution isn't to fire all the staff. It's to replace the managers.

I didnt say all the staff, but its clear a freshen up is needed. NEV/Jones etc probably could do with a new challenge
55
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Brian Moore
« Last post by FrostAndFire on Yesterday at 10:38 am »
This seems an entirely incoherent article. Arguing for spending more without any suggestions of where the income to pay for it should come from is irresponsible. We already rely on the charity of a few very wealthy men. The sport does not become more sustainable by increasing that. Maybe we need to face up to the fact that the sport in England (and Wales) does not justify the money it spends, and until it does or we spend less, we're always going to be in crisis.
56
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Academy v Japan u19
« Last post by never sleep on Yesterday at 10:34 am »
I am told England Under 19's lost 31-40 to Japan Under 19s.

Not sure how close the squad playing Quins was to full strength.

The match is on Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGhh6cwIYsU

Watching the first few minutes, it is almost a repeat to the Quins game. The Japanese speed and power gives them early quick tries.
57
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Brian Moore
« Last post by Rugbycat on Yesterday at 10:32 am »
He fails to explain, how not having a cap and spending more makes you a profit, the French cap is much higher than the Prem, they have larger stadiums and a much better TV deal, yet mostly still lose lots of money.

The biggest money making league in world sport the NFL has a pay cap, as do all the US franchise leagues except Baseball.

Better media rights and larger stadiums are the only way to make a profit, perhaps link the cap with clubs income, but that then ground naming and owners shirt deals become a way of abusing it, or just raise it by a couple of million.

One very rich person of advanced age buying into a club, does not change the problems of the league, reducing the amount of subs is down to world rugby, the french raised it and world rugby ignored it.
58
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Team For Gloucester
« Last post by FrostAndFire on Yesterday at 10:30 am »
Most players have checked out. No buy in at all...which is why a massive clear out is needed. Will take a few seasons to put right as LD has been asleep on the watch for too long. This could have been addressed 2/3 seasons ago but instead we had a plaster on a gunshot wound approach.

When most of the staff in any business have checked out and are not motivated, the solution isn't to fire all the staff. It's to replace the managers.
59
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Team For Gloucester
« Last post by JammyGit on Yesterday at 10:26 am »
Given how the team performed after spending a lot of time with our coaching staff, being thousands of miles away is probably the best possible preparation for success
60
ComeAllWithin Board / Re: Where do we go from here?
« Last post by KentQuin on Yesterday at 09:33 am »
Varied kick-offs have been with us for a while, but I think on pitch performance will make lots of STH's question whether or not they renew this year.

ST's are no longer at the levels that they can be considered discretionary spend for most fans. I've had or overheard lots of conversations of Quins or a decent holiday....
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10