News:

Author Topic: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?  (Read 3715 times)

0 Members and 59 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #75 on: »
Where are you hearing that from though?

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #76 on: »
Where are you heading that?

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #77 on: »
I would expect a quality DoR to develop a style of rugby that suits the players at their disposal. We're not south Africa so I wouldn't expect him to make us copy their approach.

Not unreasonable to expect, but have you ever seen Erasmus in charge of a team that play more expansive, attacking rugby? All I know is that I haven’t ...

I’d say there are more coaches who believe in their system above all else and demand that the players fit that rather than developing a gameplan for what they have.

I know Gustard wasn’t DoR, but he came in and tried to make us in to Saracens MkII and we know how that worked out ... Erasmus is obviously a lot more experienced and successful than Gustard, but I really don’t want to see us make another mistake with a similarly prosaic, ‘system’ based coach.

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #78 on: »
SA are strong in the forwards, but are they actually boring too? I don’t think they are, I think they still use Kolbe and Mapimpi well and play decent rugby?