News:

Author Topic: .  (Read 4714 times)

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #75 on: »
I think Matas could develop into a really useful option at 6 for us, with the versatility to move across into second row if needs must.  His athleticism combined with his aggression in the contact area is impressive.

Not sure if anyone else thought this but I was really impressed with Wev’s carrying on Tuesday night. To me it looks like he’s put on a little bit more muscle which seems to be helping in his carrying.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #76 on: »
I agree about Jurevicias. I think he will slip under the radar and end up a very good signing.

I might learn to spell his name right as well. 

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #77 on: »
Match report from the Telegraph is here

Thanks, Fred - an interesting and pleasing read. See you at the next home match v Montpelier...

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #78 on: »
Thanks, Fred - an interesting and pleasing read. See you at the next home match v Montpelier...

Yep, I'll be at the Quins Head with one of the two pint cups! See you there Bolly...

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #79 on: »
I agree about Jurevicias.
I might learn to spell his name right as well.

And learn how to pronounce it? I am currently just assigning random phonemes to it that seem to sound about right.

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #80 on: »
To add a bit to the CSW debate, I heard him talking with some friends by the red zone at the end of the match and he said that after 5 minutes his lungs were having a conversation with him but with time played he picked up. He noted that the speed of the game was a step up from Championship where he has been playing the last few weeks and further recognised that Prem rugby would be even faster; he also commented that it was easier picking up the rhythm starting than coming on later. From what we saw on Tuesday IMHO he will be a good addition to the squad, a good solid running unit with some neat offloads, when the match fitness comes which can only happen with game time.

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #81 on: »
 ::) Back to more time being needed, time to adjust, time to get fit...what...like years man?

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #82 on: »
He might come good, but time isn’t on his side as he’s 30 not 20. For the time he’s had, to still not be match fit, or at least fit is perplexing considering how long he’s been on the books.

He’s certainly got some bulk and power for sure,  but I’m not sure he’s going to get the game time he needs to get to the level he needs, as Even next season there’s a fair few ahead of him even if Symons retires as rumoured

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #83 on: »
No-one quite his size, though.

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #84 on: »
Just wish matas was bigger as he might be too small for lock. Wuch a goood player though so i look forward to how he can develop. Shame tiz is off as the battke between him lamb matas and hammond was very exciting

Re: QUINS v SALE 19:45
« Reply #85 on: »
Just wish matas was bigger as he might be too small for lock. Wuch a goood player though so i look forward to how he can develop. Shame tiz is off as the battke between him lamb matas and hammond was very exciting

Lamb madras every time!