News:

Author Topic: Team vs Bath  (Read 1983 times)

0 Members and 101 Guests are viewing this topic.

Team vs Bath
« on: »
HARLEQUINS HAVE NAMED AN UNCHANGED MATCHDAY 23 TO FACE BATH AS THE CLUB LOOK TO SECURE BACK-TO-BACK LEAGUE WINS.

Continuity is the key theme within the Club’s team selection this week as Harlequins’ coaching team opt for the same matchday 23 that claimed a record-equalling 49-17 win over last season’s Premiership finalists Wasps at the Ricoh Arena.
 
Academy products Marcus Smith and Joe Marchant hone in on 100 appearances for the Club, as Matt Symons, Danny Care and Mike Brown also near appearance milestones.
 
Commenting, Scrum Coach Adam Jones said: “It’s great for us to be able to name an unchanged team this week. We were thrilled with the boys’ performance in Coventry last weekend and we’re hoping to maintain that momentum this week.
 
“Bath are a good team, we will be expecting a reaction from them from last week. I'm sure they will come out fired up.”
 
Harlequins Starting XV
1. Joe Marler (209)
2. Scott Baldwin (26)
3. Wilco Louw (12)
4. Matt Symons (48)
5. Stephan Lewies (22) - Captain
6. Archie White (33)
7. Will Evans (29)
8. Alex Dombrandt (60)
9. Danny Care (290)
10. Marcus Smith (94)
11. Aaron Morris (55)
12. Andre Esterhuizen (9)
13. Joe Marchant (97)
14. Louis Lynagh (5)
15. Mike Brown (341)
 
Impact Players
16. Elia Elia (60)
17. Jordan Els (9)
18. Simon Kerrod (34)
19. Glen Young (28)
20. Richard de Carpentier (2)
21. Martin Landajo (23)
22. James Lang (74)
23. Tyrone Green (4)
 
Unavailable due to injury:
Michele Campagnaro, James Chisholm, Tom Lawday, Will Collier, Nathan Earle, George Head, Dino Lamb, Paul Lasike, Luke Northmore, Craig Trenier, Cadan Murley

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #1 on: »
BATH RUGBY SIDE TO FACE HARLEQUINS
1. Juan Schoeman
2. Tom Dunn
3. Christian Judge
4. Josh McNally (c)
5. Mike Williams
6. Josh Bayliss
7. Miles Reid
8. Zach Mercer

9. Ben Spencer
10. Rhys Priestland
11. Joe Cokanasiga
12. Josh Matavesi
13. Max Clark
14. Semesa Rokoduguni
15. Tom DeGlanville


REPLACEMENTS
16. Jack Walker
17. Jamie Bhatti
18. Kieran Verden
19. Ewan Richards
20. Ethan Staddon
21. Will Chudley
22. Tian Schoeman
23. Will Muir

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #2 on: »
BATH RUGBY SIDE TO FACE HARLEQUINS
1. Juan Schoeman
2. Tom Dunn
3. Christian Judge
4. Josh McNally (c)
5. Mike Williams
6. Josh Bayliss
7. Miles Reid
8. Zach Mercer

9. Ben Spencer
10. Rhys Priestland
11. Joe Cokanasiga
12. Josh Matavesi
13. Max Clark
14. Semesa Rokoduguni
15. Tom DeGlanville


REPLACEMENTS
16. Jack Walker
17. Jamie Bhatti
18. Kieran Verden
19. Ewan Richards
20. Ethan Staddon
21. Will Chudley
22. Tian Schoeman
23. Will Muir

We should have enough to see that lot off

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #3 on: »
Happy with that team, think it would have been harsh to have dropped anyone after such a good team performance. Great to see that we haven’t lost anyone this week though injury too.

The Bath starting XV is fairly strong but that’s a pretty inexperienced bench in terms of forward replacements. Should be targeting a win with these two team sheets.

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #4 on: »
Quite a physical backline from Bath. Their pack looks a bit hodge-podge though.

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #5 on: »
When was the last time we saw this?! The same team again!!! Would have been very harsh to change too much after last week. Hoping we can build with another solid performance!

The trick will be complacency and not underestimating this Bath team, which still have a solid team out on paper. I feel a quick start from us and their heads could drop after their recent form.
Like Like x 1 Agree Agree x 3 View List

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #6 on: »
COYQ
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #7 on: »
Yep that backline is pretty decently sized! 11-14 all big ball carriers so going to have to front up well in defence. Imagine that Bath wanted to compensate for their forward pack with some ball carrying in the midfield. Hopefully Esterhuizen and Evans can deal with their threats as I think Smith will be seeing a lot of traffic down his channel.

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #8 on: »
How have Bath managed to get some of those players out on the pitch? Especially with concussion protocols... Hmmm...

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #9 on: »
Wouldn’t be surprised if McNally is pulled before the game - I’ve seen us do this before, put a player in the team with fingers crossed he passes fit on the day


How have Bath managed to get some of those players out on the pitch? Especially with concussion protocols... Hmmm...

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #10 on: »
How have Bath managed to get some of those players out on the pitch? Especially with concussion protocols... Hmmm...

Pro concussion protocols are very different from amateur ones because the player can be monitored closely by medical staff. If they are asymptomatic I think it's a minimum 7 day RTP, and given they played on Friday night it's just about doable. Will have missed some training, though...

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #11 on: »
Mental that Smith has almost half of Marler's cap count already! At the current rate, he'd have more caps than Brown before he turned 30!

Obviously intl and injuries mean thats optimisitic but still pretty mental

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #12 on: »
Yep it’s crazy to think Smith is still only 21 and has that number of caps for us. Surely Eddie can’t continue to ignore him, on current form he’s the best fly half in the premiership for me.
Agree Agree x 2 View List

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #13 on: »
Good call to keep the same team, maybe now we will be more consistent in our approach.

Baths backs in particular cannot be taken lightly.
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Team vs Bath
« Reply #14 on: »
If you look at the players Bath are missing from their likely starting line-up:

     Injury: Underhill, Ewels  International call-up: Watson, Obano, Stuart, Joseph, Redpath, Faletau   


We're missing:

     Injury: Chisholm, Murley (arguably not a nailed on starter)  International call-up: no-one

While it's a shame to have no Quins players at all in the England squad, compared to when we had 6 a couple of years ago this puts us in a much stronger position.
« Last Edit: Friday 05-Feb-2021, 13:45* by Jedzi »
Agree Agree x 1 View List