News:

Author Topic: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?  (Read 3715 times)

0 Members and 59 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #60 on: »
It ain't broke, nothing to fix imho

Lack of ambition IMHO, it might not be broken but could always be better  :)

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #61 on: »
When we talk about the improvements to the team, how they play better together now, I wonder if we've not been looking in the wrong direction saying it's the coaches influence since Gustard left. Also in the mix is this guy Owen Eastwood who specialises in creating the optimum environment for making teams thrive. Is his input to the coaches/team the reason we seem to be on an upward curve now?

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #62 on: »
I hope the club, assign a guy to oversee the current group. To challenge, bring new ideas and to provide a sounding board.

It’s a very CoS role, but it’s what is required.
The current setup requires the steady hand on the tiller, happy with Millward, or similar.
It doesn’t need to be a name, we don’t want a guy that changes the current set up, but adds to it.
Complement, not change.


And accept that the current squad and coaching group are PG’s. He was doing some things right, in the building, but things move on and this current run is great, but tougher times ahead await.

Look at Exeter, they were the second best team for a good few years, hard noses were required to keep building. This is year 1, project zero.
Like Like x 2 Agree Agree x 1 View List

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #63 on: »
It would seem like Scott Robertson is out of the running, he has signed a new deal with the Crusaders


A bit like Jones not being available for England a few years back having just signed a deal.

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #64 on: »
It would seem like Scott Robertson is out of the running, he has signed a new deal with the Crusaders

That was an April Fool's joke, said he re-signed until 2065

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #65 on: »
If not Robertson, how about Andy Friend, if he can be coaxed from Connacht?

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #66 on: »
I don’t see Robertson coming, he’s holding for Kiwis or if not England. If both of those fail we have a chance. He want to replace Foster and take Kiwis to 2023 RWC.

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #67 on: »
Franck Azema is leaving Clermont this season - the rumour is he’s off to Montpellier but if he could be tempted to have a few seasons in London that could be an excellent bit of business

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #68 on: »
I don’t see Robertson coming, he’s holding for Kiwis or if not England. If both of those fail we have a chance. He want to replace Foster and take Kiwis to 2023 RWC.

The Kiwis aren't really prone to making sudden decisions on their head coach. Foster'll be in place for a while yet.

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #69 on: »
The Kiwis aren't really prone to making sudden decisions on their head coach. Foster'll be in place for a while yet.

You may well be correct, although Foster is due for renewal and they’ve not been great under him. They also risk losing Robertson to NH for RWC and beyond if they want him now is the time.

But I do hope you’re correct and he comes to us.

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #70 on: »
........ when we hit a dip in form we'll need authoritative and tough decision-making. This won't come from a player leadership group or from coaches who are best mates. We need a hardnosed DoR to make unpopular decisions and to shoulder the abuse from short-memoried fans.

We also need someone to protect the players from each other - all rosy at the moment but Lord of the Flies beckons when it becomes someone's 'fault' for upcoming losses. And some of our squad are a lot less patient than others.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #71 on: »
I’m hearing Rassie Erasmus is more or less a done deal post the Lions tour

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #72 on: »
If he brings that other chap with him....will that mean we lose some of the current coaches I wonder??

He is a winner, just not sure he wins in the way some fans would like.  Me, trophies would ease the burden of watching a "duller" rugby for sure.  Winning will become a habit and hopefully he would set the basis for a successful spell.
« Last Edit: Sunday 04-Apr-2021, 18:15* by honkytonk »

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #73 on: »
Please god not more stodgy rugby
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Director of Rugby, do we actually need one?
« Reply #74 on: »
I would expect a quality DoR to develop a style of rugby that suits the players at their disposal. We're not south Africa so I wouldn't expect him to make us copy their approach.