News:

Author Topic: Lawday  (Read 1504 times)

0 Members and 151 Guests are viewing this topic.


Re: Lawday
« Reply #1 on: »
I dont think we have seen the best of him yet.  He looked a really good player at Exeter
Agree Agree x 2 View List

Re: Lawday
« Reply #2 on: »
Happy with that.  Not a guaranteed starter, but not a concern when he's in the squad.

Re: Lawday
« Reply #3 on: »
The back row is starting to feel like it has the right amount of depth. Evans and Kenningham cover 7, Dombrandt, Chis, Lawday and White cover 6 and 8, Lewies and Lamb can play there if needed.

They've all shown that given a run in the team they can play to a decent standard, and as a selection of 6. Chis, 7. Evans, 8, Dommers and 20. Lawday is definitely up there as one of the best in the league.
Agree Agree x 1 Sad Sad x 1 Optimistic Optimistic x 1 View List

Re: Lawday
« Reply #4 on: »
We also have the chap from London Scottish. Signed as a lock but PG said we were looking at him as a BR

Re: Lawday
« Reply #5 on: »
Very useful squad player. Not first choice but happy to see him start. His form has been a bit patchy, but he has shown that with a run of games he is a decent player

Re: Lawday
« Reply #6 on: »
I dont think we have seen the best of him yet.  He looked a really good player at Exeter

Agree. He's been a bit stop start but with more consistent playing time he'll show his quality.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Re: Lawday
« Reply #7 on: »
I personally need to see a lot more from him to be convinced - I really just see him as squad filler at the moment. Our starting back row of Chisholm/Evans/Dombrandt is up there with the best in the league, but as soon as one of them is inevitably subbed off, I feel like the drop-off is considerable. I think I'm missing the days when we had a genuine impact back row option on the bench (Tom Guest). I've always thought of the 20 shirt (or 19 as it once was) as one of the most important bench shirts - if you have a proper impact player wearing it, you can flip a game on its head. I'm not sure that you could say that's what we have in Lawday on the basis of his performances for us so far...
« Last Edit: Tuesday 23-Mar-2021, 14:42* by TomBuckQuin »
Agree Agree x 2 View List

Re: Lawday
« Reply #8 on: »
I personally need to see a lot more from him to be convinced...

Perhaps you could use some of your Quins Reward Points to book a training session with him?  ;)
Funny Funny x 3 Winner Winner x 1 View List

Re: Lawday
« Reply #9 on: »
Perhaps you could use some of your Quins Reward Points to book a training session with him?  ;)

I told myself at the time that I didn't need another umbrella or car window sticker... The temptation was too much.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Re: Lawday
« Reply #10 on: »
I personally need to see a lot more from him to be convinced - I really just see him as squad filler at the moment. Our starting back row of Chisholm/Evans/Dombrandt is up there with the best in the league, but as soon as one of them is inevitably subbed off, I feel like the drop-off is considerable. I think I'm missing the days when we had a genuine impact back row option on the bench (Tom Guest). I've always thought of the 20 shirt (or 19 as it once was) as one of the most important bench shirts - if you have a proper impact player wearing it, you can flip a game on its head. I'm not sure that you could say that's what we have in Lawday on the basis of his performances for us so far...

I agree that the 20 shirt is important. And I also agree that fit and in form that's our best back row - but I don't think the drop-off is that big.

Lawday hasn't had much game time recently (I think through injury) but I remember him putting in some very good shifts when Chis was out long term. Likewise, when White had a run in the team he didn't look out of place, the odd bit of youthful overenthusiasm at the breakdown aside. And considering his inexperience, Kenningham has really impressed me - not just with how well he stepped up but with how he adapted his game and learned over the course of 80 minutes.

None of them quite offers what Guest or Clifford could at their peak, namely a genuine point of difference that could shift a game, but I've felt the absence of our main back rows less than I expected.

And collectively, our back row resources have filled an enormous Robshaw (and Clifford) shaped whole much better than I could have expected a year ago.
Agree Agree x 4 View List

Re: Lawday
« Reply #11 on: »
he's had a couple of really good games and a few average but as he's rarely started and had a lot of injuries can't really say one way or another, hopefully will be more than a squad filler moving forward, good news though we are getting the squad signed up.

Re: Lawday
« Reply #12 on: »
None of them quite offers what Guest or Clifford could at their peak, namely a genuine point of difference that could shift a game, but I've felt the absence of our main back rows less than I expected.

Yet...

And collectively, our back row resources have filled an enormous Robshaw (and Clifford) shaped whole much better than I could have expected a year ago.

Spot on
Winner Winner x 1 View List

Re: Lawday
« Reply #13 on: »
Lawday is definitely up there as one of the best in the league.

He's a decent player, but one of the best in the league seems a little overrated to me.

He looked a really good player at Exeter

In Exeter he played 8 games in one season, 3 starting and 5 off the bench.

Re: Lawday
« Reply #14 on: »
He's a decent player, but one of the best in the league seems a little overrated to me.

In Exeter he played 8 games in one season, 3 starting and 5 off the bench.

I’d like to see him get a run of games with us. He’s seems like he’s very much a Chis type back row player to me. I think he could offer a lot over the next couple of seasons