News:

Author Topic: Transfer Talk  (Read 22194 times)

0 Members and 164 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #225 on: »
Countries currently covered by Kolpak which are a significant source of players (not necessarily for us) are SA, Georgia, Fiji, Tonga & Samoa. Based purely on EU Association Agreements, not Commonwealth-related.

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #226 on: »
Lamb looks a decent player but I wish he was 3 inches taller and 2 stone heavier.

Pretty sure he started out as a flanker. I saw him play U19s 7s v Scotland and he has a turn of pace. Perhaps he was drafted in to infill when we had a second row injury jinx the other year.

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #227 on: »
I think we will see more of Lynagh next season. He is getting lots of game time and scoring some nice tries at Richmond this season.
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #228 on: »
Noticed that Lennox A is now DR with Scottish, Started out at Esher but seems to have been moved up.

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #229 on: »
Once we leave the EU the position of Kolpak players becomes very uncertain. Currently they don't need work permits as they are allowed 'freedom of movement' as if they were European citizens (because of their country's trading relationship with the EU) and can play rugby here without needing a work permit or being classified as an 'overseas' player'. Once we leave the EU, and potentially freedom of movement ends, then the automatic right of Kolpak players to ply their trade here will go. They will then, I think, need work permits and would then be classified as 'overseas' players by the Premiership/RFU which under current regulations would limit how many could play for each Premiership team. Whether exceptions can be negotiated for players who are 'Kolpak' at the point of the UK's departure from the EU is possible I guess-and may account for our enthusiasm to sign some SA players at the moment.

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #230 on: »
Once we leave the EU, and potentially freedom of movement ends, then the automatic right of Kolpak players to ply their trade here will go.

However that will also depend on the immigration deals struck.

Many South Africans also qualify for residency here due to family ties.

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #231 on: »
Once we leave the EU the position of Kolpak players becomes very uncertain. Currently they don't need work permits as they are allowed 'freedom of movement' as if they were European citizens (because of their country's trading relationship with the EU) and can play rugby here without needing a work permit or being classified as an 'overseas' player'. Once we leave the EU, and potentially freedom of movement ends, then the automatic right of Kolpak players to ply their trade here will go. They will then, I think, need work permits and would then be classified as 'overseas' players by the Premiership/RFU which under current regulations would limit how many could play for each Premiership team. Whether exceptions can be negotiated for players who are 'Kolpak' at the point of the UK's departure from the EU is possible I guess-and may account for our enthusiasm to sign some SA players at the moment.

Sale - And Quinky - will be very worried.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #232 on: »
I was born in Krugersdorp and my boots are clean!

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #233 on: »
Pretty sure he started out as a flanker. I saw him play U19s 7s v Scotland and he has a turn of pace. Perhaps he was drafted in to infill when we had a second row injury jinx the other year.

I think he has always been one of those players we’ve seen as a flanker cum lock - like George Robson, who was for a long time expected to move to blindside but became too integral to the lineout to move.

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #234 on: »
I think he has always been one of those players we’ve seen as a flanker cum lock - like George Robson, who was for a long time expected to move to blindside but became too integral to the lineout to move.

Robson was often referred to on here as a lock who was meant to be a blindside, but was there ever actually any truth in that, or it just became accepted truth as it was so often repeated. He never looked quick enough or backrow really

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #235 on: »
Sale - And Quinky - will be very worried.

Not at all... SA will still be the best team in the world, Kolpak or not 😁

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #236 on: »
Robson was often referred to on here as a lock who was meant to be a blindside, but was there ever actually any truth in that, or it just became accepted truth as it was so often repeated. He never looked quick enough or backrow really

It was definitely mentioned in his first senior season - but I think after that he bulked up to be a better lock.

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #237 on: »
Danger definitely started out as a 6

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #238 on: »
Anyone heard any rumours?

My impression is that we’ve invested very heavily in re-signing players and aren’t likely to be bringing  many (if any) new players in.

I think that is the right strategy, but when most of the clubs around us seem to be announcing transfers, some of which are fairly major, I’m curious to see if there’s any inkling of incoming players?

Re: Transfer Talk
« Reply #239 on: »
There aren't many areas where we need to sign players IMO. With oiur current squad and the academy guys coming through, I'd say we're pretty well stocked. In some areas we may even be over-stocked. That's providing at least the majority stay fit of course.